SAJEE%Editorial%Policyand%Guidelines%for%Contributors! "!RevisedJune!"!!!!!!! 3! Guidelines for Contributors: Articles should be written in clear and straight-forward style, and be free of technical jargon. Papers should be between and words in length, including abstract and references. Footnotes to the text should be avoided Editorial independence We believe that the editorial decision-making process should be independent of all commercial concerns. We achieve this by ensuring that editors are unaware of authors’ preferences regarding business model (for example, gold open access) and by having a clear Code of Conduct that defines the responsibilities of an Editor in Chief Download Editorial Policy Checklist Nature pdf. Download Editorial Policy Checklist Nature doc. Addressed by the editorial independence and the journal first instance be submitted by safety considerations, at the same conventional treatment Become aware of an organization that enhances the manuscript reporting the resolution collected
Forms and declarations | Nature
These policies underpin our commitment as a leading research publisher to editorial independence and supporting research excellence. We achieve this by requiring authors to include a statement in the manuscript that specifies the contribution of each author. We encourage collaboration with scholars and other relevant stakeholders in the locations where the research is editorial policy checklist, and expect their inclusion as co-authors when they fulfill authorship criteria.
We believe that authors, peer reviewers and editors should be required to disclose any competing interests that might influence their decisions and conclusions around a particular piece of content. We achieve this by requiring declarations of competing interests in selected journals and fields, and we aim to implement such declarations across the entire Springer Nature portfolio in the near future.
We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to support the relevant guidelines based on research community or geographical region that specify best practice in research. We believe that all correspondence between editors, editorial policy checklist, authors and peer reviewers should be treated as confidential by default. We achieve this by ensuring that all of our editors and employees receive clear guidance about the need for confidentiality during and beyond the manuscript assessment process.
Some of our journals offer a media service through which selected papers can be released confidentially to the media, under embargo, ahead of publication. We believe that research that involves the use of clinical, biomedical or biometric data from human participants must only be carried out with the explicit consent of those whose data are involved.
We achieve this by requiring editorial policy checklist to certify that such consent has been obtained, supporting our editors in identifying and managing submissions of concern, and by requiring authors to supply documentary evidence of consent when needed, editorial policy checklist.
We believe that it is our responsibility to maintain the integrity of the published literature and to act quickly to address any challenges or questions around the work that we publish.
We achieve this by having clear processes to investigate allegations of publication and research misconduct and clear policies around corrections, editorial expressions of concern and retractions. We believe that the corresponding author should be empowered to act on behalf of all co-authors during the manuscript assessment and publication process.
We achieve this by asking the corresponding author to confirm that they have the authority to act on behalf of all co-authors, and that all of the listed authors have agreed to all of the content of the book or article including the author list and author contribution statements. We believe that research benefits editorial policy checklist diversity. We aim to foster equity, diversity and inclusion within our internal practices and in published content, embody these values in all our editorial activities and to support and promote these values in the research community, editorial policy checklist.
We achieve this by setting out expectations of diversity for conferences organised by Springer Nature and working to improve the gender and geographic diversity of commissioned authors, peer reviewers and editorial board members. Nature Conferences has made specific commitments, which you can read here. We believe that the editorial decision-making process should be independent of all commercial concerns.
We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to investigate any instances of fraud or malpractice that it detects, editorial policy checklist. We achieve this by working closely with the Committee on Publication Ethics and having clear guidelines in editorial policy checklist for editors, editorial policy checklist.
Where a paper is suspected or discovered to be based on fraudulent results or to contain images that have been inappropriately manipulated, the editor will take prompt steps to investigate and to notify readers. The paper will be retracted if fraud is confirmed. We believe that it should be simple for authors to credit their funding sources, for readers to understand what these sources are, and for funders to see the works of authors they fund.
We achieve this by integrating the Crossref Funder Registry with our systems, allowing our readers to benefit from this unique editorial policy checklist of grant-giving organizations, editorial policy checklist. We believe that it should be simple for authors to link their publication to their institution, for readers to unequivocally understand the affiliation, and for institutions to see the works that have been published by their past and current employees.
We achieve this by integrating GRID APIs with our systems, allowing authors to use a list of a list of predefined institutions when submitting their work, thereby assisting disambiguation. GRID comprises a worldwide collection editorial policy checklist institutes associated with academic research. We believe that robust and well-conducted peer review supports the advance of research and discovery by ensuring that research results are robust and trustworthy.
We achieve this by ensuring that all of editorial policy checklist primary research papers and review articles that we publish are peer reviewed by appropriate experts in the field. On some journals we offer the option of double-blind peer review.
We believe that personal data should be disclosed only with the full permission of the individual to whom the data pertains. We achieve this by requiring authors to obtain consent to publish individual indentifiable personal data. In cases where personal data is published without consent, editors will retract the article or editorial policy checklist identifiable data. We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to investigate any instances of plagiarism that it detects.
We achieve this by routinely using the Crossref Similarity Check powered by iThenticate on submitted manuscripts, and having clear guidelines in place for editors.
Where a paper is suspected or discovered to be based on plagiarism, the editor must take prompt steps to investigate and to notify readers.
The paper will be corrected or retracted depending on the severity of the case. We believe that sharing preprints can accelerate research and help advance discovery. We believe that the research we publish should adhere to high standards of transparency and robustness in their methods and results.
This, in turn, supports the principle of reproducibility, which is a foundation of good research, especially in the natural sciences.
We achieve this by developing editorial processes and checklists to provide clarity for authors and supporting authors in the reporting of their work. We support the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines. We believe that Springer Nature should support community best practices in the sharing and archiving of research data.
We achieve this by facilitating compliance with research funder and institution requirements to share data. We believe that it should be as clear and easy as editorial policy checklist for a researcher to submit their manuscript and any associated Supplementary Information and data to Springer Nature. We achieve this by providing clear submission guidelines for all of our journals and books, and we are working constantly to improve and simplify our submission systems.
For some of our journals we also provide a direct submission option for content that has been uploaded to bioRxiv. We believe that it is essential to secure the correct rights to third-party editorial policy checklist in order that it can legally be published and re-used, editorial policy checklist.
We achieve this by requiring authors to editorial policy checklist permission from the copyright holder to reproduce figures, tables or text that has previously been published elsewhere.
We can provide support and advice to authors to facilitate this process. We believe that all sound research that is submitted to us should be able to find a home in one of our journals. We achieve this by providing transfer services including the Springer Nature Transfer Deskthrough which authors whose papers have been declined from their initial journal of choice receive recommendations of other suitable Springer Nature journals and, often, assistance with resubmission.
We do not allow manuscripts to be submitted to more than one journal at a time, editorial policy checklist, but will endeavor to ensure that the process of transferring a paper between journals is as efficient and as swift as possible. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Visit our main website for more information. CN Chinese, editorial policy checklist. DE German. ES Spanish. JP Japanese. Policies Home. Open research.
Peer Reviewers. What we do. About editorial policy checklist policies. Publishing policies. Editorial policies. We are currently developing a standardized approach across the whole of Springer Nature. Competing interests We believe that authors, peer reviewers and editors should be required to disclose any competing interests that might influence their decisions and conclusions around a particular piece of content.
Compliance with community guidelines and mandates We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to support the relevant guidelines based on research community or geographical region that specify best practice in research.
Confidentiality and embargos We believe that all correspondence between editors, authors and peer reviewers should be treated as confidential by default. Consent of human participants We believe that research that involves the use of clinical, biomedical or biometric data from human participants must only be carried out with the explicit consent of those whose data are involved.
Corrections and retractions We believe that it is our responsibility to maintain the integrity of the published literature and to act quickly to address any challenges or questions around the work that we publish. Corresponding authors We believe that the corresponding author should be empowered to act on behalf of all co-authors during the manuscript assessment and publication process.
Diversity commitment We believe that research benefits from diversity. Editorial independence We believe that the editorial decision-making process should be independent of all commercial concerns. Fraud and malpractice We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to investigate any instances of fraud or malpractice that it detects. Funder affiliations We believe that it should be simple for authors to credit their funding sources, for readers to understand what these sources are, and for funders to see the works of authors they fund.
Institutional affiliations We believe that it should be simple for authors to link their publication to their institution, for readers to unequivocally understand the affiliation, and for institutions to see the works that have been published by their editorial policy checklist and current employees, editorial policy checklist.
Peer-review We believe that robust and well-conducted peer review supports the advance of research and discovery by ensuring that research results are robust and trustworthy.
Personal data We believe that personal data should be disclosed only with the full permission of the individual to whom the data pertains. Plagiarism We believe that Springer Nature has a responsibility to investigate any instances of plagiarism that it detects.
Preprints We believe that sharing preprints can accelerate research and help advance discovery. Reproducibility and robustness We believe that the research we publish should adhere to high standards of transparency and robustness in their methods and results. Research data We believe that Springer Nature should support community best practices in the sharing and archiving of research data, editorial policy checklist.
More information, editorial policy checklist. Submitting your manuscript We believe that it should be as clear and easy as possible for a researcher to submit their manuscript and any associated Supplementary Information and data to Springer Nature. Third-party permissions We believe that it is essential to secure the correct rights to third-party content in order that it can legally be published and re-used. Guide to Copyright and Permissions. Transfer between journals We believe that all sound research that is submitted to us should be able to find a home in one of our journals.
Follow us on Twitter Here to foster information exchange with the library community. Follow us on Facebook. Connect on LinkedIn Connect with us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with news and development. Watch us on YouTube. Follow us on Instagram. Products Journals, editorial policy checklist. Librarians Overview. Account Development.
Authors: Revised Manuscript Submission, Editorial Manager
, time: 8:28Editorial policy guidelines for authors : Nature Support
Download Editorial Policy Checklist Nature pdf. Download Editorial Policy Checklist Nature doc. Addressed by the editorial independence and the journal first instance be submitted by safety considerations, at the same conventional treatment Become aware of an organization that enhances the manuscript reporting the resolution collected Editorial independence We believe that the editorial decision-making process should be independent of all commercial concerns. We achieve this by ensuring that editors are unaware of authors’ preferences regarding business model (for example, gold open access) and by having a clear Code of Conduct that defines the responsibilities of an Editor in Chief We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us
No comments:
Post a Comment